WATER DISTRIBUTION

BACKGROUND
Losses of potable water from urban water-distribution networks can account for up to forty percent of the amount put into supply. In part, this is due to the unnecessarily-high pressures in the distribution network which result from the inadequate levels of control currently available. If pressures in the distribution network were kept as low as possible whilst still complying with the statutory supply requirements (minimum pressure, adequate quantity etc.), this would not only reduce leakages but also minimize pumping costs. The problem is that water-distribution networks are large, complex and subject to highly-variable demands. However, with the latest analytical and optimization techniques available, it is possible to envisage an on-line control system which dynamically responds to short-term fluctuations in demand. In searching for the optimal combination of pump and valve settings, consideration would be given to continuity of supply, minimum statutory pressures and minimum accepted flow rates to avoid stagnation.


EXISTING STATE-OF-THE-ART
Hydraulic simulation models have been used for many years in the design of water-distribution networks. All are based on solving the equations relating to pipe flow and as such, are computationally time-consuming. Whereas in the past, these models have largely been used on a "trial-and-error" basis, more recently various methods of optimization have been introduced, including genetic algorithms (GA). Even though GAs are very efficient, computational times can be excessive but for design purposes , this would probably be acceptable, particularly if it resulted in a significant saving of construction costs.
Whilst a few hydraulic simulation models have been adapted for operational purposes, such as anomaly detection, none have been used for optimal control. However, various forms of mathematical programming have been used for pump scheduling, including linear programming, dynamic programming, non linear programming and decomposition-coordination methods. As a result, pump scheduling is gradually being adopted by the water industry as a means of reducing electricity costs. For Europe as a whole, annual pumping costs relating to water distribution alone, must exceed a billion euro and therefore, even a small percentage reduction represents a large monetary saving. It will, of course, be appreciated that pump-scheduling does not equate to real-time control since the former is limited to deriving a series of targets to minimize pumping costs over the next 24 hours, assuming a fixed-demand profile. Decisions relating to the control settings to achieve those targets are left to the discretion of the operating staff who use their experience and judgment on deciding where and when to turn pumps on/off and open/close valves. For a complex network, it is almost certain that an objective control system could identify a better overall solution than can be achieved by human judgment alone.